Gemini 3.5 Flash vs MiniCPM5-1B: Benchmarks, Pricing & Capabilities Compared
TL;DR — Gemini 3.5 Flash wins for reasoning + long-context · MiniCPM5-1B wins for general use.
Gemini 3.5 Flash Google
- Released
- 2026-05-19
- Context window
- 1M tokens
- Input price
- $1.50 / Mtok
- Output price
- $9.00 / Mtok
MiniCPM5-1B OpenBMB
- Released
- 2026-05-25
- Context window
- 128K tokens
- Input price
- $0.00 / Mtok
- Output price
- $0.00 / Mtok
Benchmark comparison
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash | MiniCPM5-1B |
|---|---|---|
| AA Intelligence Index | 43.3 ✓ | 17.9 |
| GPQA Diamond | 82.8% ✓ | 26.9% |
| HLE | 23.1% ✓ | 4.6% |
| IF-Bench | 47.3% ✓ | 35.2% |
| LiveCodeBench Reasoning | 53.3% ✓ | 4.7% |
| SciCode | 48.8% ✓ | 1.4% |
| TAU2-bench | 58.8% | 82.5% ✓ |
| TerminalBench-Hard | 46.2% ✓ | 0.0% |
Pricing comparison
| Metric | Gemini 3.5 Flash | MiniCPM5-1B |
|---|---|---|
| Input ($/Mtok) | $1.50 | $0.00 |
| Output ($/Mtok) | $9.00 | $0.00 |
| Cached input ($/Mtok) | — | — |
| Cost per 1M-token roundtrip (1M in + 1M out) | $10.50 | $0.00 |
Context window & modalities
| Attribute | Gemini 3.5 Flash | MiniCPM5-1B |
|---|---|---|
| Context window | 1M tokens | 128K tokens |
| Input modalities | text, image, audio, video | text |
| Output modalities | text | text |
| Knowledge cutoff | — | — |
Verdict by use case
Coding
Insufficient data
Basis: SWE-bench
No shared coding benchmark.
Reasoning
→ Gemini 3.5 Flash
Basis: GPQA Diamond
Gemini 3.5 Flash 82.8% vs MiniCPM5-1B 26.9% on GPQA Diamond.
Math
Insufficient data
Basis: MATH / AIME
No shared math benchmark.
Long context
→ Gemini 3.5 Flash
Basis: Context window
Gemini 3.5 Flash 1M tokens vs MiniCPM5-1B 128K tokens.
Cost
→ MiniCPM5-1B
Basis: Input $/Mtok
Gemini 3.5 Flash $1.5/Mtok vs MiniCPM5-1B $0/Mtok input.
Changelog & releases
Gemini 3.5 Flash
Released 2026-05-19
MiniCPM5-1B
Released 2026-05-25