Claude Fable 5 vs HyperNova 60B 2605: Benchmarks, Pricing & Capabilities Compared
TL;DR — Claude Fable 5 wins for reasoning + long-context · HyperNova 60B 2605 wins for cost.
Claude Fable 5 Anthropic
- Released
- 2026-06-09
- Context window
- 1M tokens
- Input price
- $10.00 / Mtok
- Output price
- $50.00 / Mtok
HyperNova 60B 2605 Multiverse Computing
- Released
- 2026-05-26
- Context window
- 131K tokens
- Input price
- $0.04 / Mtok
- Output price
- $0.14 / Mtok
Benchmark comparison
| Benchmark | Claude Fable 5 | HyperNova 60B 2605 |
|---|---|---|
| AA Intelligence Index | 64.9 ✓ | 29.3 |
| GPQA Diamond | 92.6% ✓ | 73.3% |
| HLE | 53.3% ✓ | 15.1% |
| IF-Bench | 63.5% | 66.5% ✓ |
| LiveCodeBench Reasoning | 70.0% ✓ | 31.7% |
| SciCode | 60.2% ✓ | 33.0% |
| TAU2-bench | 98.5% ✓ | 63.2% |
| TerminalBench-Hard | 62.9% ✓ | 23.5% |
Pricing comparison
| Metric | Claude Fable 5 | HyperNova 60B 2605 |
|---|---|---|
| Input ($/Mtok) | $10.00 | $0.04 |
| Output ($/Mtok) | $50.00 | $0.14 |
| Cached input ($/Mtok) | — | — |
| Cost per 1M-token roundtrip (1M in + 1M out) | $60.00 | $0.18 |
Context window & modalities
| Attribute | Claude Fable 5 | HyperNova 60B 2605 |
|---|---|---|
| Context window | 1M tokens | 131K tokens |
| Input modalities | text, image | text |
| Output modalities | text | text |
| Knowledge cutoff | — | — |
Verdict by use case
Coding
Insufficient data
Basis: SWE-bench
No shared coding benchmark.
Reasoning
→ Claude Fable 5
Basis: GPQA Diamond
Claude Fable 5 92.6% vs HyperNova 60B 2605 73.3% on GPQA Diamond.
Math
Insufficient data
Basis: MATH / AIME
No shared math benchmark.
Long context
→ Claude Fable 5
Basis: Context window
Claude Fable 5 1M tokens vs HyperNova 60B 2605 131K tokens.
Cost
→ HyperNova 60B 2605
Basis: Input $/Mtok
Claude Fable 5 $10/Mtok vs HyperNova 60B 2605 $0.04/Mtok input.
Changelog & releases
Claude Fable 5
Released 2026-06-09
HyperNova 60B 2605
Released 2026-05-26