Claude Fable 5 vs Qwen3.7 Plus: Benchmarks, Pricing & Capabilities Compared
TL;DR — Claude Fable 5 wins for general use · Qwen3.7 Plus wins for cost.
Claude Fable 5 Anthropic
- Released
- 2026-06-09
- Context window
- 1M tokens
- Input price
- $10.00 / Mtok
- Output price
- $50.00 / Mtok
Qwen3.7 Plus Alibaba
- Released
- 2026-06-01
- Context window
- 1M tokens
- Input price
- $0.40 / Mtok
- Output price
- $1.16 / Mtok
Benchmark comparison
| Benchmark | Claude Fable 5 | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| AA Intelligence Index | 64.9 ✓ | 53.3 |
| GPQA Diamond | 92.6% ✓ | 90.0% |
| HLE | 53.3% ✓ | 33.4% |
| IF-Bench | 63.5% | 78.0% ✓ |
| LiveCodeBench Reasoning | 70.0% ✓ | 65.0% |
| SciCode | 60.2% ✓ | 45.5% |
| TAU2-bench | 98.5% ✓ | 93.0% |
| TerminalBench-Hard | 62.9% ✓ | 47.0% |
Pricing comparison
| Metric | Claude Fable 5 | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| Input ($/Mtok) | $10.00 | $0.40 |
| Output ($/Mtok) | $50.00 | $1.16 |
| Cached input ($/Mtok) | — | — |
| Cost per 1M-token roundtrip (1M in + 1M out) | $60.00 | $1.56 |
Context window & modalities
| Attribute | Claude Fable 5 | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| Context window | 1M tokens | 1M tokens |
| Input modalities | text, image | text, image, video |
| Output modalities | text | text |
| Knowledge cutoff | — | — |
Verdict by use case
Coding
Insufficient data
Basis: SWE-bench
No shared coding benchmark.
Reasoning
→ Claude Fable 5
Basis: GPQA Diamond
Claude Fable 5 92.6% vs Qwen3.7 Plus 90% on GPQA Diamond.
Math
Insufficient data
Basis: MATH / AIME
No shared math benchmark.
Long context
Tie
Basis: Context window
Claude Fable 5 1M tokens vs Qwen3.7 Plus 1M tokens.
Cost
→ Qwen3.7 Plus
Basis: Input $/Mtok
Claude Fable 5 $10/Mtok vs Qwen3.7 Plus $0.4/Mtok input.
Changelog & releases
Claude Fable 5
Released 2026-06-09
Qwen3.7 Plus
Released 2026-06-01