Ling-2.6-1T vs MiniCPM-V 4.6 1.3B: Benchmarks, Pricing & Capabilities Compared
TL;DR — Ling-2.6-1T wins for reasoning · MiniCPM-V 4.6 1.3B wins for general use.
Ling-2.6-1T InclusionAI
- Released
- 2026-04-23
- Context window
- 262K tokens
- Input price
- $0.30 / Mtok
- Output price
- $2.50 / Mtok
MiniCPM-V 4.6 1.3B OpenBMB
- Released
- 2026-05-11
- Context window
- 262K tokens
- Input price
- $0.00 / Mtok
- Output price
- $0.00 / Mtok
Benchmark comparison
| Benchmark | Ling-2.6-1T | MiniCPM-V 4.6 1.3B |
|---|---|---|
| AA Intelligence Index | 33.6 ✓ | 12.7 |
| GPQA Diamond | 75.2% ✓ | 30.5% |
| HLE | 8.2% ✓ | 4.9% |
| IF-Bench | 56.9% ✓ | 26.7% |
| LiveCodeBench Reasoning | 34.7% ✓ | 6.3% |
| SciCode | 37.0% ✓ | 2.1% |
| TAU2-bench | 89.8% ✓ | 87.7% |
| TerminalBench-Hard | 31.1% ✓ | 0.0% |
Pricing comparison
| Metric | Ling-2.6-1T | MiniCPM-V 4.6 1.3B |
|---|---|---|
| Input ($/Mtok) | $0.30 | $0.00 |
| Output ($/Mtok) | $2.50 | $0.00 |
| Cached input ($/Mtok) | — | — |
| Cost per 1M-token roundtrip (1M in + 1M out) | $2.80 | $0.00 |
Context window & modalities
| Attribute | Ling-2.6-1T | MiniCPM-V 4.6 1.3B |
|---|---|---|
| Context window | 262K tokens | 262K tokens |
| Input modalities | text | text, image, video |
| Output modalities | text | text |
| Knowledge cutoff | — | — |
Verdict by use case
Coding
Insufficient data
Basis: SWE-bench
No shared coding benchmark.
Reasoning
→ Ling-2.6-1T
Basis: GPQA Diamond
Ling-2.6-1T 75.2% vs MiniCPM-V 4.6 1.3B 30.5% on GPQA Diamond.
Math
Insufficient data
Basis: MATH / AIME
No shared math benchmark.
Long context
Tie
Basis: Context window
Ling-2.6-1T 262K tokens vs MiniCPM-V 4.6 1.3B 262K tokens.
Cost
→ MiniCPM-V 4.6 1.3B
Basis: Input $/Mtok
Ling-2.6-1T $0.3/Mtok vs MiniCPM-V 4.6 1.3B $0/Mtok input.
Changelog & releases
Ling-2.6-1T
Released 2026-04-23
MiniCPM-V 4.6 1.3B
Released 2026-05-11