HyperNova 60B 2605 vs North Mini Code: Benchmarks, Pricing & Capabilities Compared
TL;DR — HyperNova 60B 2605 wins for general use · North Mini Code wins for long-context.
HyperNova 60B 2605 Multiverse Computing
- Released
- 2026-05-26
- Context window
- 131K tokens
- Input price
- $0.04 / Mtok
- Output price
- $0.14 / Mtok
North Mini Code Cohere
- Released
- 2026-06-09
- Context window
- 256K tokens
- Input price
- $0.00 / Mtok
- Output price
- $0.00 / Mtok
Benchmark comparison
| Benchmark | HyperNova 60B 2605 | North Mini Code |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 73.3% | 75.7% ✓ |
| HLE | 15.1% ✓ | 9.9% |
| IF-Bench | 66.5% ✓ | 57.6% |
| LiveCodeBench Reasoning | 31.7% | 32.3% ✓ |
| SciCode | 33.0% | 38.2% ✓ |
| TAU2-bench | 63.2% ✓ | 37.4% |
| TerminalBench-Hard | 23.5% | 31.1% ✓ |
Pricing comparison
| Metric | HyperNova 60B 2605 | North Mini Code |
|---|---|---|
| Input ($/Mtok) | $0.04 | $0.00 |
| Output ($/Mtok) | $0.14 | $0.00 |
| Cached input ($/Mtok) | — | — |
| Cost per 1M-token roundtrip (1M in + 1M out) | $0.18 | $0.00 |
Context window & modalities
| Attribute | HyperNova 60B 2605 | North Mini Code |
|---|---|---|
| Context window | 131K tokens | 256K tokens |
| Input modalities | text | text |
| Output modalities | text | text |
| Knowledge cutoff | — | — |
Verdict by use case
Coding
Insufficient data
Basis: SWE-bench
No shared coding benchmark.
Reasoning
→ North Mini Code
Basis: GPQA Diamond
HyperNova 60B 2605 73.3% vs North Mini Code 75.7% on GPQA Diamond.
Math
Insufficient data
Basis: MATH / AIME
No shared math benchmark.
Long context
→ North Mini Code
Basis: Context window
HyperNova 60B 2605 131K tokens vs North Mini Code 256K tokens.
Cost
→ North Mini Code
Basis: Input $/Mtok
HyperNova 60B 2605 $0.04/Mtok vs North Mini Code $0/Mtok input.
Changelog & releases
HyperNova 60B 2605
Released 2026-05-26
North Mini Code
Released 2026-06-09